Abstract:A sample multi-objective optimization method is proposed for the error-similarity-based error compensation method. Firstly, qualitative analysis is performed to show the influence of the samples on error compensation, and the characteristics and mathematical model of the optimal samples are proposed based on the engineering application requirements of error compensation method. Then, a sample multi-objective optimization method based on NSGA-Ⅱ (non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-Ⅱ) is proposed to solve the optimization problem of sample points. Finally, experiments and contrastive analysis are performed, and it is shown that the maximum positioning error of the robot is reduced from 1.4953 mm to 0.2752mm by using the optimal sample set, which is better than the other 2 random sample sets. The experimental results verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed methods.
[1] 洪鹏,田威,梅东棋,等.空间网格化的机器人变参数精度补偿技术[J].机器人,2015,37(3):327-335.Hong P, Tian W, Mei D Q, et al. Robotic variable parameter accuracy compensation using space grid[J]. Robot, 2015, 37(3):327-335.
[2] Nubiola A, Bonev I A. Absolute calibration of an ABB IRB 1600 robot using a laser tracker[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2013, 29(1):236-245.
[3] 刘振宇,陈英林,曲道奎,等.机器人标定技术研究[J].机器人,2002,24(5):447-450.Liu Z Y, Chen Y L, Qu D K, et al. Research on robot calibration[J]. Robot, 2002, 24(5):447-450.
[4] Borm J H, Menq C H. Determination of optimal measurement configurations for robot calibration based on observability measure[J]. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1991, 10(1):51-63.
[5] Driels M R, Pathre U S. Significance of observation strategy on the design of robot calibration experiments[J]. Journal of Robotic Systems, 1990, 7(2):197-223.
[6] Nahvi A, Hollerbach J M. The noise amplification index for optimal pose selection in robot calibration[C]//IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Piscataway, USA:IEEE, 1996:647-654.
[7] Sun Y, Hollerbach J M. Observability index selection for robot calibration[C]//IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Piscataway, USA:IEEE, 2008:831-836.
[8] Joubair A, Bonev I A. Comparison of the efficiency of five observability indices for robot calibration[J].\columnbreak Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2013, 70:254-265.
[9] 周炜,廖文和,田威.基于空间插值的工业机器人精度补偿方法理论与试验[J].机械工程学报,2013,49(3):42-48.Zhou W, Liao W H, Tian W. Theory and experiment of industrial robot accuracy compensation method based on spatial interpolation[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 49(3):42-48.
[10] Zeng Y F, Tian W, Li D W, et al. An error-similarity-based robot positional accuracy improvement method for a robotic drilling and riveting system[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 88(9-12):2745-2755.
[11] Zeng Y F, Tian W, Liao W H. Positional error similarity analysis for error compensation of industrial robots[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2016, 42:113-120.
[12] Tian W, Mei D Q, Li P C, et al. Determination of optimal samples for robot calibration based on error similarity[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2015, 28(3):946-953.
[13] Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm:NSGA-Ⅱ[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2):182-197.