ZHAO Zhengtao, ZHAO Wentao, SUN Zhaoyang, WANG Jin, WAN Bing. A VFOSELM-SRP-based Method for Path Prediction of Autonomous Sailboats[J]. ROBOT, 2025, 47(2): 249-258. DOI: 10.13973/j.cnki.robot.240071
Citation: ZHAO Zhengtao, ZHAO Wentao, SUN Zhaoyang, WANG Jin, WAN Bing. A VFOSELM-SRP-based Method for Path Prediction of Autonomous Sailboats[J]. ROBOT, 2025, 47(2): 249-258. DOI: 10.13973/j.cnki.robot.240071

A VFOSELM-SRP-based Method for Path Prediction of Autonomous Sailboats

More Information
  • Received Date: April 01, 2024
  • Revised Date: September 22, 2024
  • Accepted Date: September 10, 2024
  • Autonomous sailboats, as cutting-edge platforms for ocean observation, offer unparalleled capabilities for long-duration, large-scale, and high spatiotemporal resolution marine monitoring tasks. However, it is difficult to predict the trajectories of autonomous sailboats accurately by fixed models, due to the complex and variable nature of the marine environment, coupled with the extensive temporal and spatial scope of their operations. To address this challenge, a path prediction method based on VFOSELM-SRP (variable-forgetting-factor-based online sequential extreme learning machine) model is proposed, to tackle the trajectory prediction difficulties of the Seagull autonomous navigation sailboat. The proposed method leverages the VFOSELM for real-time prediction of the sailboat's coordinates, and utilizes SRP to compensate for prediction errors. To validate the effectiveness of this method, an experiment is conducted in the South China Sea using the Seagull, during which relevant data are collected. These data are fed into the model in a streaming form, and the prediction performance of the model is rigorously evaluated. Experimental results indicate that, compared to an online sequential extreme learning machine with a fixed forgetting mechanism, the proposed method reduces the mean distance error by 77.4% and the root mean square error by 78.3%, thereby significantly enhancing the prediction accuracy. Furthermore, it is compared with other advanced trajectory prediction algorithms in terms of training time and prediction accuracy, to comprehensively assess the prediction performance of the proposed VFOSELM-SRP model. The results indicate that the VFOSELM-SRP model demonstrates remarkable advantages in both training time and precision aspects.
  • [1]
    俞建成, 孙朝阳, 张艾群. 无人帆船研究现状与展望[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(24): 98-110. doi: 10.3901/JME.2018.24.098

    YU J C, SUN Z Y, ZHANG A Q. Research status and prospect of autonomous sailboats[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(24): 98-110. doi: 10.3901/JME.2018.24.098
    [2]
    RIEPPI A, RIEPPI F, MARZOA M, et al. Autonomous sailboat control based on reinforcement learning for navigation in variable conditions[C]//XLIX Latin American Computer Conference. Piscataway, USA: IEEE, 2023. doi: 10.1109/CLEI60451.2023.10346120
    [3]
    HUANG Y J, DU J T, YANG Z R, et al. A survey on trajectory-prediction methods for autonomous driving[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2022, 7(3): 652-674. doi: 10.1109/TIV.2022.3167103
    [4]
    LIU C, LI T, WU W, et al. Event-triggered predictive path following control of autonomous ships with an MMG model[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 314. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119582.doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119582
    [5]
    BHARILYA V, KUMAR N. Machine learning for autonomous vehicle's trajectory prediction: A comprehensive survey, challenges, and future research directions[J]. Vehicular Communications, 2024, 46. doi: 10.1016/j.vehcom.2024.100733.doi:10.1016/j.vehcom.2024.100733
    [6]
    CAPOBIANCO S, MILLEFIORI L M, FORTI N, et al. Deep learning methods for vessel trajectory prediction based on recurrent neural networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2021, 57(6): 4329-4346. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2021.3096873
    [7]
    ZHANG M Y, TAIMURI G, ZHANG J F, et al. A deep learning method for the prediction of 6-DoF ship motions in real conditions[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 2023, 237(4): 887-905. doi: 10.1177/14750902231157852
    [8]
    ZHANG M, KUJALA P, MUSHARRAF M, et al. A machine learning method for the prediction of ship motion trajectories in real operational conditions[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 283. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114905.doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114905
    [9]
    PEI L S, WU H B. Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medical Education Online, 2019, 24(1). doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538.doi:10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538
    [10]
    HOI S C H, SAHOO D, LU J, et al. Online learning: A comprehensive survey[J]. Neurocomputing, 2021, 459: 249-289. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.04.112
    [11]
    ANDERSON T. The theory and practice of online learning[M]. 2nd ed. Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University Press, 2008. https://www.aupress.ca/app/uploads/120146_99Z_Anderson_2008-Theory_and_Practice_of_Online_Learning.pdf
    [12]
    LIMA A R, CANNON A J, HSIEH W W. Forecasting daily streamflow using online sequential extreme learning machines[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 537: 431-443. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.017
    [13]
    OZA N C, RUSSELL S J. Online bagging and boosting[C]//Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press, 2001: 229-236. https://proceedings.mlr.press/r3/oza01a.html
    [14]
    DEWHIRST O P, EVANS H K, ROSKILLY K, et al. Improving the accuracy of estimates of animal path and travel distance using GPS drift-corrected dead reckoning[J]. Ecology and Evolution, 2016, 6(17): 6210-6222. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2359
    [15]
    SOLOMATINE D, SEE L M, ABRAHART R J. Data-driven modelling: Concepts, approaches and experiences[M]//Water Science and Technology Library, Vol.68. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2008: 17-30. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-79881-1_2
    [16]
    范尚雍. 船舶操纵性[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1988. http://find.nlc.cn/search/showDocDetails?docId=4600212788500359653&dataSource=ucs01&query=

    FAN S Y. Ship maneuverability[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 1988. http://find.nlc.cn/search/showDocDetails?docId=4600212788500359653&dataSource=ucs01&query=
    [17]
    HASHEMI A, RAHIMPOUR M, MERATI M R. Dynamic Gaussian filter for muscle noise reduction in ECG signal[C]//23rd Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering. Piscataway, USA: IEEE, 2015: 120-124. doi: 10.1109/IranianCEE.2015.7146194
    [18]
    YE Y B, SQUARTINI S, PIAZZA F. Online sequential extreme learning machine in nonstationary environments[J]. Neurocomputing, 2013, 116: 94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2011.12.064
    [19]
    GOMES H M, READ J, BIFET A. Streaming random patches for evolving data stream classification[C]//IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Piscataway, USA: IEEE, 2019: 240-249. doi: 10.1109/ICDM.2019.00034
    [20]
    BERNARDO A, DELLA VALLE E, BIFET A. Choosing the right time to learn evolving data streams[C]//IEEE International Conference on Big Data. Piscataway, USA: IEEE, 2023: 5156-5165. doi: 10.1109/BigData59044.2023.10386551
    [21]
    PANICKER N K K, VALARMATHI J. A GWO optimized SVR for time series prediction of black carbon across a tropical coastal station in India[C]//3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Internet of Things. Piscataway, USA: IEEE, 2024. doi: 10.1109/AⅡoT58432.2024.10574633
    [22]
    LIU Y, HU T G, ZHANG H R, et al. iTransformer: Inverted transformers are effective for time series forecasting[DB/OL]. (2024-03-14)[2024-05-14]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06625

Catalog

    Article views (52) PDF downloads (13) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return